Single-cell sequencing shows cellular heterogeneity of cutaneous lesions in lupus erythematosus.

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are both types of lupus, yet the characteristics, and differences between them are not fully understood. Here we show single-cell RNA sequencing data of cutaneous lesions from DLE and SLE patients and skin tissues from healthy controls (HCs). We find significantly higher proportions of T cells, B cells and NK cells in DLE than in SLE. Expanded CCL20+ keratinocyte, CXCL1+ fibroblast, ISGhiCD4/CD8 T cell, ISGhi plasma cell, pDC, and NK subclusters are identified in DLE and SLE compared to HC. In addition, we observe higher cell communication scores between cell types such as fibroblasts and macrophage/dendritic cells in cutaneous lesions of DLE and SLE compared to HC. In summary, we clarify the heterogeneous characteristics in cutaneous lesions between DLE and SLE, and discover some specific cell subtypes and ligand-receptor pairs that indicate possible therapeutic targets of lupus erythematosus.

Identification of Significant Genes and Pathways for the Chronic and Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus via Bioinformatics Analysis.

Background: Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) are both common variants of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) that mainly involve the skin and mucous membrane. Oral mucosal involvement is frequently observed in patients of CLE. Despite that they have different clinicopathological features, whether there is a significant difference in pathogenesis between them remains unclear. Herein, we investigated specific genes and pathways of SCLE and CCLE via bioinformatics analysis. Methods: Microarray expression datasets of GSE109248 and GSE112943 were both retrieved from the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CCLE or SCLE skin tissues and health controls were selected by GEO2R. Common DEGs were picked out via the Venn diagram software. Then, functional enrichment and PPI network analysis were conducted, and the top 10 key genes were identified via Cytohubba. Results: Totally, 176 DEGs of SCLE and 287 DEGs of CCLE were identified. The GO enrichment and KEGG analysis of DEGs of SCLE is significantly enriched in the response to virus, defense response to virus, response to IFN-gamma, cellular response to IFN-γ, type I IFN signaling pathway, chemokine activity, chemokine receptor binding, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, etc. The GO enrichment and KEGG analysis of DEGs of CCLE is significantly enriched in the response to virus, regulation of multiorganism process, negative regulation of viral process, regulation of lymphocyte activation, chemokine receptor binding, CCR chemokine receptor binding, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, etc. The top 10 hub genes of SCLE and CCLE, respectively, include STAT1, CXCL10, IRF7, ISG15, and RSAD2 and CXCL10, IRF7, IFIT3, CTLA4, and ISG15. Conclusion: Our finding suggests that SCLE and CCLE have the similar potential key genes and pathways and majority of them belong to IFN signatures and IFN signaling pathway. Besides, the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway might also have an essential role in the pathogenesis of SCLE and CCLE. Together, the identified genes and signaling pathways have enhanced our understanding of the mechanism underlying the occurrence and development of both SCLE and CCLE.

A Novel Type I Interferon Primed Dendritic Cell Subpopulation in TREX1 Mutant Chilblain Lupus Patients.

Heterozygous TREX1 mutations are associated with monogenic familial chilblain lupus and represent a risk factor for developing systemic lupus erythematosus. These interferonopathies originate from chronic type I interferon stimulation due to sensing of inadequately accumulating nucleic acids. We here analysed the composition of dendritic cell (DC) subsets, central stimulators of immune responses, in patients with TREX1 deficiency. We performed single-cell RNA-sequencing of peripheral blood DCs and monocytes from two patients with familial chilblain lupus and heterozygous mutations in TREX1 and from controls. Type I interferon pathway genes were strongly upregulated in patients. Cell frequencies of the myeloid and plasmacytoid DC and of monocyte populations in patients and controls were similar, but we describe a novel DC subpopulation highly enriched in patients: a myeloid DC CD1C+ subpopulation characterized by the expression of LMNA, EMP1 and a type I interferon- stimulated gene profile. The presence of this defined subpopulation was confirmed in a second cohort of patients and controls by flow cytometry, also revealing that an increased percentage of patient's cells in the subcluster express costimulatory molecules. We identified a novel type I interferon responsive myeloid DC subpopulation, that might be important for the perpetuation of TREX1-induced chilblain lupus and other type I interferonopathies.

Differential genotypes of TNF-α and IL-10 for immunological diagnosis in discoid lupus erythematosus and oral lichen planus: A narrative review.

Discoid lupus erythematosus and oral lichen planus are chronic systemic immune system-mediated diseases with unclear etiology and pathogenesis. The oral mucosa is the common primary site of pathogenesis in both, whereby innate and adaptive immunity and inflammation play crucial roles. The clinical manifestations of discoid lupus erythematosus on the oral mucosa are very similar to those of oral lichen planus; therefore, its oral lesion is classified under oral lichenoid lesions. In practice, the differential diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus and oral lichen planus has always relied on the clinical manifestations, with histopathological examination as an auxiliary diagnostic tool. However, the close resemblance of the clinical manifestations and histopathology proves challenging for accurate differential diagnosis and further treatment. In most cases, dentists and pathologists fail to distinguish between the conditions during the early stages of the lesions. It should be noted that both are considered to be precancerous conditions, highlighting the significance of early diagnosis and treatment. In the context of unknown etiology and pathogenesis, we suggest a serological and genetic diagnostic method based on TNF-α and IL-10. These are the two most common cytokines produced by the innate and adaptive immune systems and they play a fundamental role in maintaining immune homeostasis and modulating inflammation. The prominent variability in their expression levels and gene polymorphism typing in different lesions compensates for the low specificity of current conventional diagnostic protocols. This new diagnostic scheme, starting from the immunity and inflammation of the oral mucosa, enables simultaneous comparison of discoid lupus erythematosus and oral lichen planus. With relevant supportive evidence, this information can enhance physicians' understanding of the two diseases, contribute to precision medicine, and aid in prevention of precancerous conditions.

Prominent B-Cell Signature Differentiates Discoid from Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

Although B cells account for a significant proportion of the lymphocytic infiltrate in discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), their contribution to pathogenesis is unknown. In this study, we compare the immune landscape of 17 subjects with DLE with that of 21 subjects with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus using transcriptomic and histologic analyses of lesional skin. A few of the subjects (3 of 17 subjects with DLE, and 5 of 21 subjects with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus) had concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus. Using a modified Autoimmune Profiling Panel (NanoString Technologies, Seatle, WA), we show that B-cell‒specific genes, including canonical pan‒B cell markers CD19 (P = 0.0060), MS4A1 (CD20) (P = 0.0047), and CD79a (P = 0.0201), are among the most upregulated genes in DLE. Numerous other genes encoding B-cell‒associated proteins, including Igs, BAFF receptors, and FCRL family members, are similarly enriched. Relative cell type scoring reveals that among various inflammatory cell types, only B cells are more prevalent in DLE. Digital whole-image slide analysis of immunohistochemistry for B cells (CD20) and T cells (CD3) supports our gene expression findings of a disproportionately greater B-cell infiltrate in DLE lesions. Overall, this study identifies a B-cell‒predominant signature unique to DLE and highlights the importance of studying the role of cutaneous B cells in DLE pathogenesis.

Skin CD4+ Trm cells distinguish acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus from localized discoid lupus erythematosus/subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and other skin diseases.

BACKGROUND: Although the contribution of aberrant CD4+ T cell signaling to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is well established, its role in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) skin is largely unknown. Because the rate of systemic manifestations varies in each subtype, resident memory CD4+ T cells in lesions that are responsible for only skin-associated tissue responses may vary in each subtype. However, the role of CD4+ tissue-resident memory T (CD4+ Trm) cells in each CLE subtype remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To analyze and compare CD4+ Trm cells and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) identified by smart RNA sequencing (Smart-seq) in CD4+ Trm cells from patients with acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), and localized discoid lupus erythematosus (localized DLE) lesions. METHODS: We performed Smart-seq to investigate differences in dermal CD4+ Trm cells between patients with ACLE and normal controls (NCs). Multicolor immunohistochemistry was utilized to measure the levels of AIM2 in CD4+ Trm cells present in the skin of 134 clinical patients, which included patients with localized DLE (n = 19), ACLE (n = 19), SCLE (n = 16), psoriasis (n = 12), rosacea (n = 17), lichen planus (n = 18), and annular granuloma (n = 15), as well as NCs (n = 18). RESULTS: The Smart-seq data showed higher AIM2 expression in skin CD4+ Trm cells from ACLE lesions than NCs (fold change >10, adjusted P < 0.05). AIM2 expression in CD4+ Trm cells did not vary according to age or sex. AIM2 expression in CD4+ Trm cells was significantly lower in patients with ACLE (6.38 ± 5.22) than localized DLE (179.41 ± 160.98, P < 0.0001) and SCLE (63.43 ± 62.27, P < 0.05). In an overall comparison of ACLE with localized DLE and SCLE, the receiver operating characteristic curve for AIM2 expression in CD4+ Trm cells had a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 82.86% at a cutoff value of 18.26. In a comparison of ACLE with localized DLE, the sensitivity was 89.47%, and the specificity was 100.00% at a cutoff value of 12.26. In a comparison of ACLE with SCLE, the sensitivity was 100.00%, and the specificity was 75.00% at a cutoff value of 18.26. CONCLUSIONS: The number of CD4+ Trm cells is increased in lesions of SCLE and localized DLE compared to ACLE, suggesting that CD4+ Trm cells may have a more crucial role in persistent lesions of SCLE and localized DLE. In addition, AIM2 expression in CD4+ Trm cells discriminates patients with ACLE from those with localized DLE and SCLE.

Altered expression of genes controlling metabolism characterizes the tissue response to immune injury in lupus.

To compare lupus pathogenesis in disparate tissues, we analyzed gene expression profiles of human discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). We found common increases in myeloid cell-defining gene sets and decreases in genes controlling glucose and lipid metabolism in lupus-affected skin and kidney. Regression models in DLE indicated increased glycolysis was correlated with keratinocyte, endothelial, and inflammatory cell transcripts, and decreased tricarboxylic (TCA) cycle genes were correlated with the keratinocyte signature. In LN, regression models demonstrated decreased glycolysis and TCA cycle genes were correlated with increased endothelial or decreased kidney cell transcripts, respectively. Less severe glomerular LN exhibited similar alterations in metabolism and tissue cell transcripts before monocyte/myeloid cell infiltration in some patients. Additionally, changes to mitochondrial and peroxisomal transcripts were associated with specific cells rather than global signal changes. Examination of murine LN gene expression demonstrated metabolic changes were not driven by acute exposure to type I interferon and could be restored after immunosuppression. Finally, expression of HAVCR1, a tubule damage marker, was negatively correlated with the TCA cycle signature in LN models. These results indicate that altered metabolic dysfunction is a common, reversible change in lupus-affected tissues and appears to reflect damage downstream of immunologic processes.

Identification of key genes and pathways in discoid lupus skin via bioinformatics analysis.

ABSTRACT: Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is the most common skin manifestation of lupus; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying DLE remain unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in discoid lupus skin and investigate their potential pathways.To identify candidate genes involved in the occurrence and development of the disease, we downloaded the microarray datasets GSE52471 and GSE72535 from the Gene Expression Database (GEO). DEGs between discoid lupus skin and normal controls were selected using the GEO2R tool and Venn diagram software (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID), Enrichr, and Cytoscape ClueGo were used to analyze the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome pathways and gene ontology. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) of these DEGs were further assessed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval Interacting Genes version 10.0.Seventy three DEGs were co-expressed in both datasets. DEGs were predominantly upregulated in receptor signaling pathways of the immune response. In the PPI network, 69 upregulated genes were selected. Furthermore, 4 genes (CXCL10, ISG15, IFIH1, and IRF7) were found to be significantly upregulated in the RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway, from analysis of Enrichr and Cytoscape ClueGo.The results of this study may provide new insights into the potential molecular mechanisms of DLE. However, further experimentation is required to confirm these findings.

An Update on the Pathogenesis of Skin Damage in Lupus.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lupus erythematosus (LE) is characterized by broad and varied clinical forms ranging from a localized skin lesion to a life-threatening form with severe systemic manifestations. The overlapping between cutaneous LE (CLE) and systemic LE (SLE) brings difficulties to physicians for early accurate diagnosis and sometimes may lead to delayed treatment for patients. We comprehensively review recent progress about the similarities and differences of the main three subsets of LE in pathogenesis and immunological mechanisms, with a particular focus on the skin damage. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies on the mechanisms contributing to the skin damage in lupus have shown a close association of abnormal circulating inflammatory cells and abundant production of IgG autoantibodies with the skin damage of SLE, whereas few evidences if serum autoantibodies and circulating inflammatory cells are involved in the pathogenesis of CLE, especially for the discoid LE (DLE). Till now, the pathogenesis and molecular/cellular mechanism for the progress from CLE to SLE are far from clear. But more and more factors correlated with the differences among the subsets of LE and progression from CLE to SLE have been found, such as the mutation of IRF5, IFN regulatory factors and abnormalities of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs), Th1 cells, and B cells, which could be the potential biomarkers for the interventions in the development of LE. A further understanding in pathogenesis and immunological mechanisms for skin damage in different subsets of LE makes us think more about the differences and cross-links in the pathogenic mechanism of CLE and SLE, which will shed a light in predictive biomarkers and therapies in LE.

A novel TRAF3IP2 variant causing familial scarring alopecia with mixed features of discoid lupus erythematosus and folliculitis decalvans.

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is an autoimmune disorder with a poorly defined etiology. Despite epidemiologic gender and ethnic biases, a clear genetic basis for DLE remains elusive. In this study, we used exome and RNA sequencing technologies to characterize a consanguineous Lebanese family with four affected individuals who presented with classical scalp DLE and generalized folliculitis. Our results unraveled a novel biallelic variant c.1313C > A leading to a missense substitution p.(Thr438Asn) in TRAF3IP2(NM_147200.3). Expression studies in cultured cells revealed mis-localization of the mutated protein. Functional characterization of the mutated protein showed significant reduction in the physical interaction with the interleukin 17-A receptor (IL17RA), while interaction with TRAF6 was unaffected. By conducting a differential genome-wide transcriptomics analysis between affected and non-affected individuals, we showed that the hair follicle differentiation pathway is drastically suppressed, whereas cytokine and inflammation responses are significantly upregulated. Furthermore, our results were highly concordant with molecular signatures in patients with DLE from a public dataset. In conclusion, this is the first report on a new putative role for TRAF3IP2 in the etiology of DLE. The identified molecular features associated with this gene could pave the way for better DLE-targeted treatment.

MicroRNA Expression Profiling Identifies miR-31 and miR-485-3p as Regulators in the Pathogenesis of Discoid Cutaneous Lupus.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a common and disfiguring manifestation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are the most prevalent forms. Despite sharing histological similarities, clinically they differ in their course and prognosis, suggesting different pathogenesis. Here, we show that DLE-affected skin has a specific microRNA expression profile when compared with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Among the DLE-specific microRNAs, we identified one keratinocyte-derived microRNA, miR-31, and one leukocyte-derived microRNA, miR-485-3p. We show that UV and transforming growth factor-ß1 stimulation up-regulates miR31 expression in DLE. Specific miR-31 overexpression induces keratinocyte apoptosis and NF-κB pathway activation with the production of related inflammatory cytokines and contributes to the recruitment of neutrophils and intermediate monocytes at the inflammation site. IL-1α and TGF-ß1 stimulation increased the expression of miR-485-3p in peripheral mononuclear blood cells from DLE patients and induced T-cell activation, mainly of CD8 lymphocytes. In addition, miR-485-3p overexpression in dermal fibroblasts contributes to fibrosis by targeting peroxisome PGC-1α. Collectively, our findings suggest that overexpression of miR-31 and miR-485-p contribute to skin inflammation in DLE lesions by regulating the production of inflammatory mediators and attracting neutrophils and intermediate monocytes to the skin.

A comprehensive review of immune-mediated dermatopathology in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an autoimmune disease with a broad clinical spectrum ranging from cutaneous lesions to severe systemic manifestations. The pathogenesis of the disease and the immunological mechanisms for the heterogeneities in lupus remain unclear. The LE-specific cutaneous manifestations are generally divided into three categories: acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). Clinically, lupus patients with skin lesions can be divided into two subsets based on the organs involved: cutaneous LE, such as DLE and SCLE, which appears only as a skin manifestation, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), e.g., ACLE, which involves other organs, such as kidneys, joints, and the hematopoietic system. However, lupus is an aggressive disease, and cutaneous lupus and systemic lupus partially overlap. Fewer than 5% of DLE patients and approximately 50% of SCLE patients might develop major organ damage and then develop SLE in subsequent years. Furthermore, there are no predictive biomarkers in clinical use. To the best of our knowledge, increasing evidence from clinical trials has revealed that early intervention can either reduce or delay the onset of severe manifestations. Therefore, identification of certain biomarkers in skin lesions or circulation from patients with skin lesions to predict future flares and advise treatment is an unmet need. In this review, we comprehensively describe the subtypes of LE with pathological criteria and clinical manifestations; summarize the up-to-date evidence on certain cell distributions, such as keratinocytes, neutrophils, dendritic cells, T cells and B cells, in skin and peripheral blood; and discuss their pathogenic roles and their potential roles in predictive diagnosis and as therapeutic targets.

Chinese lupus treatment and research group (CSTAR) registry: X. family history in relation to lupus clinical and immunological manifestations.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the associations between family history and clinical manifestations and immunologic characteristics of lupus in China. METHODS: Based on their family history, lupus patients from the Chinese lupus treatment and research group (CSTAR) registry were categorised: familial lupus (FL), family history of other rheumatic disorders (RD), and sporadic lupus (SL). Demographic data, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data were compared among these three groups. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 patients from CSTAR were included, with 34 (1.6%) in the FL group, 50 (2.4%) in the RD group, and 2,020 (96.0%) in the SL group. There were no significant differences in age or gender among these groups (p=0.36 and p=0.75, respectively). The prevalence of discoid rash and positivity of anti-RNP antibodies differed significantly among the three groups. Photosensitivity and neurological disorder were marginally significantly different among the three groups (p=0.05). No statistical differences were observed in other clinical manifestations or laboratory results. In the FL group, first-degree relatives (25/34, 73.5%) had higher susceptibility to lupus. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (35/50, 70.0%) was the most frequent non-lupus rheumatic disorder in the RD group. CONCLUSIONS: Among lupus patients, the rate of familial lupus was lower in Chinese patients than among other ethnicities. Familial lupus cases are found mainly among their first-degree relatives. A family history of lupus did not significantly affect clinical phenotypes, except for higher frequency of discoid rash and anti-RNP in the FL group, and more anti-RNP positivity in the RD group.

Microarray study reveals a transforming growth factor-ß-dependent mechanism of fibrosis in discoid lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is characterized by scarring lesions that develop and perpetuate fibrotic lesions. These are not observed in subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). The pathophysiological basis of this is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To identify contradistinctive signalling pathways and cellular signatures between the two type of lupus, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms leading to fibrosis. METHODS: We conducted a gene expression microarray analysis in lesional and nonlesional skin biopsy specimens of patients with DLE (n = 10) and SCLE (n = 10). Confirmatory reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry were performed on selected transcripts in a new cohort of paraffin-embedded skin biopsies (n = 20). Changes over time of a group of selected inflammatory and fibrotic genes were also evaluated in a second biopsy taken 12 weeks later. In vitro functional studies were performed in primary isolated fibroblasts. RESULTS: Compared with nonlesional skin, DLE samples expressed a distinctive T-cell gene signature. DLE samples displayed a significant CD4 T-cell enrichment with an imbalance towards T helper 1 cytokine predominance and a relative increased forkhead box (FOX)P3 response. RT-qPCR and immunochemical analysis over time showed a progressive increment of fibrotic markers and persistent FOXP3 recruitment. Ex vivo upregulation of SERPINE1, MMP9, TGFBR1, phosphorylated SMAD3 and TGFB1 suggested a transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß-dependent mechanism of fibrosis in DLE, also confirmed by the results observed following in vitro stimulation with TGF-ß. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight major pathogenic pathways in DLE and provide novel molecular targets for the development of new therapies. The data suggest the existence of a TGF-ß-dependent pathway inducing fibrosis in DLE.

A subset of CD163+ macrophages displays mixed polarizations in discoid lupus skin.

INTRODUCTION: Lesional skin of patients with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) contains macrophages, whose polarization has yet to be investigated. To test our hypothesis that M1 macrophages would be increased in DLE skin, we examined transcriptome alterations in immune cell gene expression and macrophage features in DLE and normal skin by using gene expression and histochemical approaches. METHODS: Gene expression of RNA from DLE lesional and normal control skin was compared by microarrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Both skin groups were analyzed for CD163 expression by immunohistochemistry. Double immunofluorescence studies were performed to characterize protein expression of CD163+ macrophages. RESULTS: DLE skin had twice as many upregulated genes than downregulated genes compared with normal skin. Gene set enrichment analysis comparing differentially expressed genes in DLE and normal skin with previously published gene sets associated with M1 and M2 macrophages showed strong overlap between upregulated genes in DLE skin and M1 macrophages. Quantitative RT-PCR showed that several M1 macrophage-associated genes--e.g., chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1)-had amplified mRNA levels in DLE skin. CD163+ macrophages were increased near the epidermal-dermal junction and perivascular areas in DLE skin compared with normal skin. However, double immunofluorescence studies of CD163+ macrophages revealed minor co-expression of M1 (CXCL10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and CD127) and M2 (CD209 and transforming growth factor-beta) macrophage-related proteins in DLE skin. CONCLUSION: Whereas a subset of CD163+ macrophages displays mixed polarizations in DLE skin, other immune cells such as T cells can contribute to the expression of these macrophage-related genes.

Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) peripheral blood identifies systemic alterations relevant to the skin manifestation.

Major gaps remain regarding pathogenetic mechanisms underlying clinical heterogeneity in lupus erythematosus (LE). As systemic changes are likely to underlie skin specific manifestation, we analyzed global gene expression in peripheral blood of a small cohort of chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE) patients and healthy individuals. Unbiased hierarchical clustering distinguished patients from controls revealing a "disease" based signature. Functional annotation of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) highlight enrichment of interferon related immune response and apoptosis signatures, along with other key pathways. There is a 26% overlap of the blood and lesional skin transcriptional profile from a previous analysis by our group. We identified four transcriptional "hot spots" at chromosomal regions harboring statistically increased numbers of DEGs which offer prioritized potential loci for downstream fine mapping studies in the search for CCLE specific susceptibility loci. Additionally, we uncover evidence to support both shared and distinct mechanisms for cutaneous and systemic manifestations of lupus.

Detection of inheritance pattern in thirty-three Mexican males with chronic granulomatous disease through 123 dihydrorhodamine assay.

BACKGROUND: There are two inheritance patterns, the X-linked recessive (XL) pattern and the autosomal recessive pattern. There is no information on the predominant inheritance pattern of male patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the inheritance pattern in a cohort of Mexican male patients with CGD by means of the detection of an XL status carrier among their female relatives, and to describe the frequency of discoid lupus (DL) among carriers. METHODS: We detected the female relatives within the families of male patients with CGD, and carried out the 123 dihydrorhodamine (DHR) assay in all female participants. All carriers were questioned for current or past established DL diagnosis. RESULTS: We detected 33 families with one or more CGD male patients; we found an XL-CGD in 79% of the relatives from at least one female relative with a bimodal pattern. For the remaining seven relatives we were not able to confirm a carrier status by means of a DHR assay. Moreover, we detected one mother with CGD secondary to skewed X-chromosome inactivation. We also found 47 carriers, and only one carrier with DL among them. CONCLUSION: We concluded that XL-CGD is the most frequent form of CGD in a cohort of CGD male patients in Mexico. DHR assay is a fast and practical tool to determine the CGD form in the Latin-American countries. Finally, DL frequency in Mexico is lower than that reported in the literature for other regions of the world.

Differential gene expression analysis in CCLE lesions provides new insights regarding the genetics basis of skin vs. systemic disease.

Lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune condition affecting multiple organs including skin, which remains poorly understood. To investigate pathogenetic processes relevant to cutaneous lupus as compared to systemic disease, we generated genome-wide expression data from lesional and non-lesional skin of chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE) patients. We reveal LE skin-associated transcriptional profiles and identify prominent functional pathways. A subset of CCLE differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was found to overlap with systemic lupus, including those linked to interferon and apoptosis. We identified 13 skin associated transcriptional "hot spots" that represent activated chromosomal regions. Seventeen CCLE DEGs (eight within "hot spots") were found to overlap with previously reported SLE-associated susceptibility loci. Additionally, we identify chromosomal regions not previously associated with lupus, potentially harboring distinct susceptibility loci for CCLE. This study suggests that overlapping as well as distinct genetic factors underlie disease pathogenesis in systemic and cutaneous lupus.

Mannose binding lectin deposition in skin of lupus erythematosus patients: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Mannose binding lectin (MBL) has been linked to predisposition to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to disease activity. Some studies found deposits of MBL in glomerular tissue of patients with lupus nephritis. There is no research about the deposition of MBL in skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Skin biopsies from lesional and non lesional skin of 4 discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and 10 SLE patients were submitted to immunofluorescence staining for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C4, C1q, C5b-9 and MBL. Charts were reviewed for demographic, clinical and serological data. Patients with SLE had disease activity measured by SLEDAI. RESULTS: MBL was found only in SLE lesional skin and its presence showed an association trend towards higher disease activity. Deposition of C5b-9 occurred in vessels only in patients with SLE (70%) and in the two patients with kidney involvement. CONCLUSIONS: MBL deposition was found in the lesional skin of SLE patients but not in SLE non lesional skin nor in DLE patients, and it seems to be less frequent and less strong than observed in the kidneys biopsies, suggesting that the complement participation in the pathophysiology of SLE process may not be the same in these two clinical manifestations.